Source: Trends in Neuroscience (2006), 29: 632-639
Article Type: Review
Authors: MP Mattson, A Cheng

Image taken from: http://www.bad-bad.de/gesch/paracel.gif
Recently, the hormesis theory is gaining momentum for explaining the health-beneficial effects of diets rich in fruits and vegetables. Actually, one of the first to describe hormetic effects of any substance applied to living things has been Paracelsus, one of the most famous scientists of the 16th century.
What is hormesis? The term describes the induction of health-beneficial effects due to the low-dose presence of agents that are toxic at higher concentrations (adaptive response). In this regard, phytochemicals (such as polpyhenols) can be considered as mild stressors provoking the up-regulation of the endogenous antioxidant network. This in turn would enable an organism to better cope with an increasing production of reactive oxidative and nitrosative species (ROS and RNS), for example in disease states. Consequently, the detrimental degeneration of proteins, fatty acids, sugars and DNA would be avoided. In the long run, this could finally lead to a healthier aging process, characterised by a lower burden of chronic, lifestyle maladies. Mattson and Cheng support this concept by summarising recent data obtained with, amongst others, the neurohormetic phytochemicals resveratrol and curcumin in vitro and in vivo.
Personally, I feel quite comfortable with this theory. However, whether it will help to answer the recurring question of whether an increase/decrease in biomarkers such as antioxidant capacity or antioxidant enzyme activity upon incubation/intake of phytochemicals is actually beneficial or detrimental, only time will tell.
For further reading, I recommend: Arumugam et al., 2006 and Hipkiss, 2006 and Hayes, 2007.